8/26/11

September 4th, the 12th week of Pentecost, Channel of Peace

The following is a 10 minute worship for September 4th, the 12th week of Pentecost, Channel of Peace. You can either listen on the flash player below or download it to your favorite music program to sync with your mp3 player by clicking on "DOWNLOAD" or play it on your smartphone's music player by clicking PLAY . You now also have the option of receiving these notices each week and on festival days by signing up for the 10W constant contact email list on the right or on your phone by texting 10W to 22828.  Please consider helping to fund this ministry by clicking on the donation link on the right. 

6/2/10

Statement Regarding the Israeli Military Interception of Gaza Flotilla

 from Presiding Bishop Mark S. Hanson

On behalf of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and The Lutheran World Federation, organizations that are deeply engaged with and committed to the Lutheran Christians and all persons living in Palestine and Israel, I express my deep sadness regarding events surrounding the flotilla seeking to deliver humanitarian goods to Gaza. We deeply regret the deaths and injuries that resulted when Israeli forces intercepted the boats. Our thoughts and prayers are with the wounded and the families of those killed or otherwise harmed during this incident. We note that this tragic incident occurred on the first day of the World Council of Churches’ World Week for Peace in Palestine and Israel.

This incident raises many questions that must be answered. We therefore call for a full, international, and independent investigation into this matter.

While we condemn all violence in the resolution of political disputes, this incident raises a number of questions related to the just use of force. It is not clear that, in this incident, all alternatives were explored prior to the use of military force. One tenet of the just use of force is proportionality, a principle I raised during my meeting with the chief rabbis of the State of Israel during Operation Cast Lead, the Israeli incursion into Gaza which lasted from December 2008 to January 2009. This incident provides an example of how proportionality is an ongoing concern related to Israeli military action against civilians, both Palestinians and internationals.

The attempt to deliver humanitarian materials to Gaza via the flotilla highlights the ongoing blockade of Gaza with all its consequences for the 1.5 million people living there. Israel’s blockade must be fully lifted, in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1860. While some humanitarian aid has been allowed to reach the people of Gaza, the economy, particularly the agricultural and fishing sectors, has been devastated. Basic goods including seeds and seedlings, plastic piping, irrigation supplies, fishing nets, engine spare parts, veterinary drugs and cement are restricted.

The World Health Organization has documented the serious deterioration in Gaza’s health system due to restrictions for patients and medical personnel attempting to travel into or out of Gaza. The welfare of the people of Gaza and the safety of Israelis will be served by opening the monitored border crossings in a secure manner for aid, trade and commerce.

This tragic event demonstrates the urgency of achieving a just peace. One role of religious leaders, including the churches, is to strengthen those voices working for peace, rather than yielding to the clamor of extremism, as we seek a just peace beneficial for all persons in the region.

We urge that this incident not interrupt the proximity talks now being conducted through the Obama administration. Instead, we expect that this incident will intensify on all sides the commitment to serious negotiations that will lead to a just resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


The Rev. Mark S. Hanson
Presiding Bishop, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
President, Lutheran World Federation

5/10/10

7th Sunday of Easter

John 17:20-26

Call us dear Lord
that we may all be one
One in love
One in your name
One in prayer
Pray for us Lord
that we may all be you children
Unique, but one
Whole and part of the whole
Individual persons
each loved
and gathered around your table
One family
Divided through our own efforts
but united in you
Fill us with the love of God
that we
in spite of ourselves
may love
That we
in spite of ourselves
may gather
That we
in spite of ourselves
may pray
That we
in spite of ourselves
and because of your love
may pray
---- gather
--------worship
------------ together
as one
in You
Amen

5/6/10

Mothers In Arms

New York Times, May 10, 1992
By Stephanie Coontz

Criticism of the corruption of Mothers Day has become as much a cliché as the holiday itself. Most people believe that Mother's Day started out as a private celebration of women's family roles and relations. We took Mom breakfast in bed to thank her for all the meals she made us. We picked her a bouquet of flowers to symbolize her personal, unpaid services. We tried to fix in our memory those precious moments of her knitting sweaters or sitting at our bedside, all the while focusing on her devotion to her family and ignoring her broader social ties, interests and political concerns.

Today, many complain, the personal element in this celebration has been lost. Mother's Day is just another occasion to make money. It is the busiest day of the year for restaurants, and the week that precedes it is the single-best for florists. The real meaning of Mother's Day is gone.

Such lamentation about the holiday's degradation reflect a misunderstanding of its history. It was the education of Mother's Day to sentimentalism and private family relations that made it so vulnerable to commercial exploitation.

The 19th century forerunners of our modern holiday were called mothers' days, not Mother's Day. The plural is significant: They celebrated the extension of women's moral concerns beyond the home. They commemorated mothers' civic roles and services to the nation, not their private roles and personal services to the family. The women who organized the first mothers' days believed motherhood was a political force that should be mobilized on behalf of the entire community, not merely an expression of a fundamental instinct that led them to lavish all their time and attention on their children.

The earliest call for a mothers' day came from Anna Reeves Jarvis, a community activist, who in 1858 organized Mothers' Work Days in West Virginia to improve sanitation in Appalachian communities. During the Civil War, the women she mobilized cared for the wounded on both sides and, after the war's end, arranged meetings to persuade the men to lay aside their enmities.

The holiday's other precursor began in Boston in 1872, when Julia Ward Howe, author of the "Battle Hymn of the Republic," proposed an annual Mothers' Day for Peace. This was celebrated on June 2 in most Northeastern cities for the next 30 years.

The message that Mrs. Howe's mothers sent to the Government was a far cry from today's syrupy platitudes: "Our husbands shall not come to us, reeking with carnage... Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn all that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy and patience. We women of one country will be too tender of those of another country to allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs."

The connection of motherhood to movements for peace and social justice made particular sense in the 19th century. Despite its repressiveness, the Victorian image of motherhood gave women moral responsibility beyond the household, a duty that for many translated easily into social activism. Women played a leading role in anti-slavery agitation, temperance movements, consumer protection drives and the construction of America's social welfare system. They believed their role as mothers made them especially suited for political and social activities.

After the turn of the century, however, women's expanding political and economic activities beyond the home collided with the growth of a consumer economy. While women won important reforms in the public sphere, their maternal and moral responsibilities were privatized and linked to their role as "purchasing agent" for the family. Sentimentalization of motherhood seemed to go hand in hand with its trivialization.

This was the context in which Anna Jarvis's daughter, also named Anna Jarvis, began a letter-writing campaign to honor her own mother by getting a special day set aside for all mothers. Politicians and businessmen who had opposed l9th century women's reforms embraced an individualistic Mother's Day that could be, as Florists' Review, the industry's trade magazine, put it, "exploited."

The adoption of Mother's Day by Congress on May 8, 1914, represented a reversal of everything the 19th century mothers' days had stood for. Speeches proclaiming the occasion repudiated women's social and political roles, except to emphasize the importance of mothers in teaching their children to obey the state. One antisuffrage leader inverted the original intent of mothers' day entirely when she asked rhetorically: If a woman becomes "a mother to the Municipality, who is going to mother us?"

Its bond with social reform snapped, Mother's Day drifted into the orbit of the marketing industry. Outraged when florist "profiteers" began selling carnations for $1, the younger Anna Jarvis set about combating the commercialization of the day she had worked so hard to establish. Within a few years; however, Florists' Review was able to announce that "Miss Jarvis was completely squelched." For her part, Anna Jarvis became more and more obsessed with exposing those who would undermine Mother's Day with their greed." She was eventually committed to a sanitarium, where she died in 1948, just before the real takeoff of Mother's Day commercialization in the 1950's.

Women in the 1990's have even more reason than Anna Jarvis to resent those who celebrate Mother's Day by offering store-bought sentiments as a substitute for supporting the basic needs of mother's and children. The Government devotes a smaller proportion of its resources to financing children's education than any other major democracy. A majority of American mothers now work for pay, but they still face a second shift at home and lack adequate parental leave policies or childcare facilities. Poor American mothers, have lower incomes relative to the rest of the population, less assistance with job placement and childcare and less medical coverage than in any other advanced industrial nation.

But this disrespect for mothers will not be solved by forgoing the Mother's Day all-you-can-eat buffets and retreating even further into the nuclear family. Such a move would only revive the most stultifying, repressive aspects of 19th century domesticity while jettisoning the elements that made it bearable: motherhood's connection to larger social and political ideals of peace and justice.

Mother's Day belongs neither in the shopping mall nor the kitchen, but in the streets and community action groups where it originated.

Mother's Day Proclamation - 1870

by Julia Ward Howe

Arise then...women of this day!
Arise, all women who have hearts!
Whether your baptism be of water or of tears!
Say firmly:"We will not have questions answered by irrelevant agencies,
Our husbands will not come to us, reeking with carnage,
For caresses and applause.
Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn
All that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy and patience.
We, the women of one country,
Will be too tender of those of another country
To allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs.
"From the voice of a devastated Earth a voice goes up with
Our own. It says: "Disarm! Disarm!
The sword of murder is not the balance of justice.
"Blood does not wipe our dishonor,
Nor violence indicate possession.
As men have often forsaken the plough and the anvil
At the summons of war,
Let women now leave all that may be left of home
For a great and earnest day of counsel.
Let them meet first, as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead.
Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means
Whereby the great human family can live in peace...
Each bearing after his own time the sacred impress, not of Caesar,
But of God -In the name of womanhood and humanity, I earnestly ask
That a general congress of women without limit of nationality,
May be appointed and held at someplace deemed most convenient
And the earliest period consistent with its objects,
To promote the alliance of the different nationalities,
The amicable settlement of international questions,
The great and general interests of peace.

4/30/10

Immigration

With all the controversy around the immigration issues in Arizona, sometimes it is nice to put our feet back on the ground and look at social statement by the ELCA

9/1/09

random quotes from ELCA social statement on Health Care

Introduction
Health is central to our well-being, vital to relationships, and helps us live out our vocations in family, work, and community. Caring for one’s own health is a matter of human necessity and good stewardship. Caring for the health of others expresses both love for our neighbor and responsibility for a just society. As a personal and social responsibility, health care is a shared endeavor

Fear and self-interest defeat social justice in the political processes of health care reform. The stress on individuals and families because of society's inability to fashion an adequate health care system makes action increasingly urgent. The breadth and complexity of the challenges require serious conversations and bold strategies to establish the shared personal and social responsibilities that make good health possible.

The health of each individual depends on the care of others and the commitment of society to provide health care for all.Health care is a shared endeavor. Just as each person’s health relies on others, health care depends on our caring for others and ourselves.

Regardless of the means used to provide health care and ensure access to it, we must diligently preserve the nature of health care as a shared endeavor. This means that we recognize our mutual responsibilities and guard against the ways in which motivation to maximize profit and to market health care like a commodity jeopardizes health and the quality of health care for all.

Our search for justice is a call from God, a concern especially for the "rights of the needy" (Jeremiah 5:28). Because health is central to personal well-being and functioning in society, a just society is one that supports the health of all its members. Thus, our common effort to provide access to health care for all is a matter of social justice for all people. Justice requires giving to each person his or her due.

Health care is the kind of good most appropriately given on the basis of need. Too often, however, health care is distributed on the basis of merit, social worth or contribution, marketplace value, or ability to pay.

Achieving these obligations of love and justice requires sacrifice, goodwill, fairness, and an abiding commitment to place personal and social responsibilities of love and justice above narrower individual, institutional, and political self-interests. For some people, this may mean paying more in taxes or in direct payments to assure that everyone has care. As difficult as this may be, citizens should not shrink from these moral challenges. We urge all people to advocate for access to basic health care for all and to participate vigorously and responsibly in the public discussion on how best to fulfill this obligation.

The chronic failure of our society to provide its members access to basic health care services is a moral tragedy that should not be tolerated. Alongside the pursuit of justice, we in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America recognize the biblical obligation that each person in society is responsible for the neighbor.People should ask not only whether they are being served as individuals, but also whether anyone is being left behind in the ongoing advance of medical progress.

full social statement at: http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Social-Statements/Health-and-Healthcare.aspx

8/21/09

ELCA Assembly Opens Ministry to Partnered Gay and Lesbian Lutherans

MINNEAPOLIS (ELCA) - The 2009 Churchwide Assembly of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) voted today to open the ministry of the church to gay and lesbian pastors and other professional workers living in committed relationships.

The action came by a vote of 559-451 at the highest legislative body of the 4.6 million member denomination. Earlier the assembly also approved a resolution committing the church to find ways for congregations that choose to do so to "recognize, support and hold publicly accountable life-long, monogamous, same gender relationships," though the resolution did not use the word "marriage."

The actions here change the church's policy, which previously allowed gays and lesbians into the ordained ministry only if they remained celibate.

Throughout the assembly, which opened Aug. 17, the more than 1,000 voting members have debated issues of human sexuality. On Wednesday they adopted a social statement on the subject as a teaching tool and policy guide for the denomination.

The churchwide assembly of the ELCA is meeting here Aug. 17-23 at the Minneapolis Convention Center. About 2,000 people are participating, including 1,045 ELCA voting members. The theme for the biennial assembly is "God's work. Our hands."

Before discussing the thornier issues of same-gender unions in the ordained ministry, the assembly approved, by a vote of 771-230, a resolution committing the church to respect the differences of opinions on the matter and honor the "bound consciences" of those who disagree.

During the hours of discussion, led by ELCA Presiding Bishop Mark S. Hanson, the delegates paused several times each hour for prayer, sometimes as a whole assembly, sometimes in small groups around the tables where the voting members of the assembly sat, debated and cast their votes.

Discussion here proved that matters of sexuality will be contentious throughout the church. A resolution that would have reasserted the church's current policy drew 344 votes, but failed because it was rejected by 670 of the voting members.

Pastor Richard Mahan of the ELCA West Virginia-Western Maryland Synod was among several speakers contending that the proposed changes are contrary to biblical teaching. "I cannot see how the church that I have known for 40 years can condone what God has condemned," Mahan said, "Nowhere does it say in scripture that homosexuality and same sex marriage is acceptable of God."

But others said a greater acceptance of people who are gay and lesbian in the church was consistent with the Bible. Bishop Gary Wollersheim of the ELCA Northern Illinois Synod said, "It's a matter of justice, a matter of hospitality, it's what Jesus would have us do." Wollersheim said he had been strongly influenced by meetings with youth at youth leadership events in his synod, a regional unit of the ELCA.

Some speakers contend that the actions taken here will alienate ELCA members and cause a drop in membership. But Allison Guttu of the ELCA Metropolitan New York Synod said, "I have seen congregations flourish while engaging these issues; I have seen congregations grow recognizing the gifts of gay and lesbian pastors."

During discussion of resolutions on implementation of the proposals, Bishop Kurt Kusserow of the ELCA Southwestern Pennsylvania Synod asked that the church make clear provision in its policies to recognize the conviction of members who believe that this church cannot call or roster people in a publicly accountable, lifelong, monagamous, same-gender relationship. A resolution that the denomination consider a proposal for how it will exercise flexibility within its existing structure and practices to allow Lutherans in same gender relationship to be approved for professional service in the church. That resolution passed by a vote of 667-307.

8/12/09

Help stop the Veto

Tuesdays evening vote by the Anchorage Assembly is cause for a cautious celebration and is a very brief respite for the LGBT community, and supporters of equal rights in Anchorage, Alaska. AO 2009-64 passed the Anchorage City Assembly, including “sexual orientation” as a protected class, illegal to discriminate against. The vote ended in 7 votes in favor and 4 opposed. This was the culmination of months of public hearings (over 600), tireless grassroots efforts, bitter and well-funded opposition from Jerry Prevo’s Anchorage Baptist Temple, and a city Assembly that conducted themselves brilliantly.

Mayor Dan Sullivan, son of former Anchorage Mayor George Sullivan, has the opportunity to veto this ordinance, just as his father did back in the seventies, when a bill with the same purpose successfully passed the Assembly.

As members of the Anchorage faith community, I call upon you to contact Mayor Sullivan with your input regarding discrimination in Anchorage. Identify yourself as a member of a faith community and mention the name of your church affiliation and ask that Mayor Sullivan Not Veto this important ordinance.

Email Mayor Sullivan.
Call Mayor Sullivan at (907) 343-7170
If that doesn’t work, try (907) 343-7100

Faith Based Health Care debate info from Sojourners and PICO

An excellent faith bases source for discussion of the Health Care debate from Sojourners and PICO.

This two page PDF handout provides an initial resource for congregations to engage in the health care debate in a constructive way, based on faith values.
http://www.sojo.net/action/alerts/Health_Care_Toolkit_2-page.pdf

An eight page dicussion guide
http://www.sojo.net/action/alerts/health_care_toolkit.pdf

The home web site for the above and other information:
http://www.sojo.net/index.cfm?action=action.display&item=HC09-main

8/7/09

NIMBY

I was scared and angry last Sunday, two emotions that are more closely connected in our psyche than most would want to acknowledge. I woke up and got the newspaper and a cup of coffee. The dog followed me out and went for her morning romp. Most days she barks at the back door in a few minutes after smelling all the smells in the area and making sure all is as it should be. This morning however her return was delayed. I called and called to no avail. My wife stepped outside and heard a dog yelping and I went to investigate. Our back yard is undeveloped woods and borders on a gravel section of Huffman road. It was along that section that I pinpointed the intermittent yelping and found our dog. She was standing in a torn bag of garbage and fish guts with the plastic pull strap around her neck pinning her to the ground. She was scared and stinky and when I released her she ran in a panic to the house. The day before we had a black bear in our yard, I now knew what attracted it. We left for a trip right after church and it was Wednesday morning before I could dawn rubber gloves and clean up the mess, by then there were four additional smelly garbage bags to dispose of.

I was scared at what might have happened to our dog and how sick she might have become. I was scared at how close she came to strangling herself. I was angry that someone would throw garbage in our back yard and then to assure that it was no accident, to later heap more bags on the same site. Many facets of the incident have been rolling around in my head ever since.

In Genesis 4 we hear the story of the first brothers, Cain and Abel. After Cain killed Abel the Lord came and said to Cain, "Where is your brother Abel?" "I don't know," he replied. "Am I my brother's keeper?"

First it is interesting to note that the first homicide in the Bible is a fratricide. Which begs the question, Biblically speaking is not all killing, from the darkness of the back alleys to antiseptic chambers set aside for lethal injection, the same? Even in Cain’s answer, there is a distancing of the self. Am I my brother’s keeper, whether answered in the affirmative or in the negative, denotes a separation that our quest for rugged individuality perpetuates. Am I my brother’s keeper? The answer is more than a simple “no, you are not your brother’s keeper.” The answer is “No, you are not your brother’s keeper; you are your brother’s Brother, your sister’s Sister.”

In my lifetime there has been a significant shift from “we” to “me.” It is manifest in our housing as we have moved from a walkway to the front porch, to a driveway and a back deck, from getting a hammer and board to fix that hole you stepped in on your neighbor’s porch to going to court to sue for damages. Theologically, Jesus has been changed from the risen Christ who brought salvation to all to my personal savior that I have made a decision to follow thus proving the serpent’s rightness all along that “I” could be a god in charge of my own salvation. Equal rights in Anchorage is only a concern for someone else’s children and the garbage only becomes a problem when it, and the bear it draws in, are in my back yard.

Carl Marx rightly pointed out the flaw of Christian charity. The real Christian task should not be that of just helping the poor with charity; rather it is to ensure for the poor the exercise of those rights whereby they can cease to be poor. The generosity of our giving in this, and many other churches in Anchorage is exemplar, but to acknowledge one another as brother or sister is to see in each act of charity the systemic injustice that perpetuates the need. Without confronting the injustice, the simple act of charity alone is the acknowledgement of the correctness of Carl Marx’s judgment that the perpetuation of that injustice then becomes the permanent fount through which our generosity assuages our guilt.

Rather than condemning the NIMBY’s (Not In My Back Yard) of the world, scripture points to the correctness of that approach and then, as if confronting the expert in the law in each one of us, Jesus points to a definition of neighbor that is beyond our limited geographical understanding (Luke 10). Christ’s understanding of NIMBY acknowledges the bag of fish guts that might have killed my dog as well as well as the poison that is pumped into the air to provide cheep goods for my consumption, the waste from our nuclear plants safely stored away for our children’s children to deal with. Christ’s NIMBY means it is not enough to relish the joy of your daughter’s marriage without allowing others the same joy at the marriage of their child who may love differently than your own. Christ’s NIMBY is to recognize that great health care is not great when it is beyond the affordable reach of some.

So rather than turning my anger outward only, to confront the demon who despoiled my space, I am called by the love of God to confront also the injustice the despoils the lives of the many to whom Jesus points to and says, they too are your neighbor, your brother and your sister. To the victims of injustice, inaction differs little from wrong action. So stand up and say, Not In My Back Yard, then look to the horizon and begin to grasp just how expansive that back yard really is and how many brothers and sisters live therein.

6/17/09

sosanchorage

Following the Anchorage Assembly meetings on the equal rights amemdment I had some thoughts and ran across this cartoon from http://www.nakedpastor.com/.

Jesus said I am the way, no one comes to the Father but by me. All too often that has been used as an exclusive statement ignoring the many rooms comment just preceding it. This verse, out of context, has been used to promote the perpetuation, not of Jesus’ way, but more often the way of the white straight male Christian right. In my lifetime, the white has largely been dropped as a defining characteristic. In some circles, the male likewise has fallen into disuse. In too many circles however, not being straight is still outside the dogmatically defined circle of God’s love. With the proper use of fear, it sells, and fills the pews and coffers and maintains the power structure. The circles Jesus drew were quite different however, much more inclusive than the Pharisees then or now wish to accept. Jesus’ way is one of compassion, one of grace, one of many rooms in a rainbow of colors. In response, our calling in this life is to recognize one another as brothers and sisters, no matter what faith, if any, or sexual orientation we practice, and build a world that is based on caring about, and for, one another. The opposite of faith is not non-faith, but the oft used weapon of public opinion, fear. When the angels announced the birth of Christ, their first words were “fear not” heralding a new era in God’s circle drawing. It is no accident that the message of sosanchorage.com is one of fear. Through the ages it has been proven to be one of the most successful tools to counter the grace of God in Christ. Father, forgive them, even when they know what they do.



6/9/09

Paul Hawken's Commencement Address to the Class of 2009

University of Portland, May 3rd, 2009

by Paul Hawken

When I was invited to give this speech, I was asked if I could give a simple short talk that was "direct, naked, taut, honest, passionate, lean, shivering, startling, and graceful." No pressure there.

Let's begin with the startling part. Class of 2009: you are going to have to figure out what it means to be a human being on earth at a time when every living system is declining, and the rate of decline is accelerating. Kind of a mind-boggling situation... but not one peer-reviewed paper published in the last thirty years can refute that statement. Basically, civilization needs a new operating system, you are the programmers, and we need it within a few decades.

This planet came with a set of instructions, but we seem to have misplaced them. Important rules like don't poison the water, soil, or air, don't let the earth get overcrowded, and don't touch the thermostat have been broken. Buckminster Fuller said that spaceship earth was so ingeniously designed that no one has a clue that we are on one, flying through the universe at a million miles per hour, with no need for seatbelts, lots of room in coach, and really good food-but all that is changing.

There is invisible writing on the back of the diploma you will receive, and in case you didn't bring lemon juice to decode it, I can tell you what it says: You are Brilliant, and the Earth is Hiring. The earth couldn't afford to send recruiters or limos to your school. It sent you rain, sunsets, ripe cherries, night blooming jasmine, and that unbelievably cute person you are dating. Take the hint.

And here's the deal: Forget that this task of planet-saving is not possible in the time required. Don't be put off by people who know what is not possible. Do what needs to be done, and check to see if it was impossible only after you are done.

When asked if I am pessimistic or optimistic about the future, my answer is always the same: If you look at the science about what is happening on earth and aren't pessimistic, you don't understand the data. But if you meet the people who are working to restore this earth and the lives of the poor, and you aren't optimistic, you haven't got a pulse. What I see everywhere in the world are ordinary people willing to confront despair, power, and incalculable odds in order to restore some semblance of grace, justice, and beauty to this world.

The poet Adrienne Rich wrote, "So much has been destroyed I have cast my lot with those who, age after age, perversely, with no extraordinary power, reconstitute the world." There could be no better description. Humanity is coalescing. It is reconstituting the world, and the action is taking place in schoolrooms, farms, jungles, villages, campuses, companies, refuge camps, deserts, fisheries, and slums.

You join a multitude of caring people. No one knows how many groups and organizations are working on the most salient issues of our day: climate change, poverty, deforestation, peace, water, hunger, conservation, human rights, and more. This is the largest movement the world has ever seen. Rather than control, it seeks connection. Rather than dominance, it strives to disperse concentrations of power. Like Mercy Corps, it works behind the scenes and gets the job done. Large as it is, no one knows the true size of this movement. It provides hope, support, and meaning to billions of people in the world. Its clout resides in idea, not in force. It is made up of teachers, children, peasants, businesspeople, rappers, organic farmers, nuns, artists, government workers, fisherfolk, engineers, students, incorrigible writers, weeping Muslims, concerned mothers, poets, doctors without borders, grieving Christians, street musicians, the President of the United States of America, and as the writer David James Duncan would say, the Creator, the One who loves us all in such a huge way.

There is a rabbinical teaching that says if the world is ending and the Messiah arrives, first plant a tree, and then see if the story is true. (Note: Martin Luther was suppose to have said, when asked what he would do if he knew the world was going to end tomorrow, that he would plant an apple tree and go about the business the Lord had put him on earth to do) Inspiration is not garnered from the litanies of what may befall us; it resides in humanity's willingness to restore, redress, reform, rebuild, recover, re-imagine, and reconsider. "One day you finally knew what you had to do, and began, though the voices around you kept shouting their bad advice," is Mary Oliver's description of moving away from the profane toward a deep sense of connectedness to the living world.

Millions of people are working on behalf of strangers, even if the evening news is usually about the death of strangers. This kindness of strangers has religious, even mythic origins, and very specific eighteenth-century roots. Abolitionists were the first people to create a national and global movement to defend the rights of those they did not know. Until that time, no group had filed a grievance except on behalf of itself. The founders of this movement were largely unknown - Granville Clark, Thomas Clarkson, Josiah Wedgwood - and their goal was ridiculous on the face of it: at that time three out of four people in the world were enslaved. Enslaving each other was what human beings had done for ages. And the abolitionist movement was greeted with incredulity.

Conservative spokesmen ridiculed the abolitionists as liberals, progressives, do-gooders, meddlers, and activists. They were told they would ruin the economy and drive England into poverty. But for the first time in history a group of people organized themselves to help people they would never know, from whom they would never receive direct or indirect benefit. And today tens of millions of people do this every day. It is called the world of non-profits, civil society, schools, social entrepreneurship, non-governmental organizations, and companies who place social and environmental justice at the top of their strategic goals. The scope and scale of this effort is unparalleled in history.

The living world is not "out there" somewhere, but in your heart. What do we know about life? In the words of biologist Janine Benyus, life creates the conditions that are conducive to life. I can think of no better motto for a future economy. We have tens of thousands of abandoned homes without people and tens of thousands of abandoned people without homes. We have failed bankers advising failed regulators on how to save failed assets. We are the only species on the planet without full employment. Brilliant. We have an economy that tells us that it is cheaper to destroy earth in real time rather than renew, restore, and sustain it. You can print money to bail out a bank but you can't print life to bail out a planet. At present we are stealing the future, selling it in the present, and calling it gross domestic product. We can just as easily have an economy that is based on healing the future instead of stealing it. We can either create assets for the future or take the assets of the future. One is called restoration and the other exploitation. And whenever we exploit the earth we exploit people and cause untold suffering. Working for the earth is not a way to get rich, it is a way to be rich.

The first living cell came into being nearly 40 million centuries ago, and its direct descendants are in all of our bloodstreams. Literally you are breathing molecules this very second that were inhaled by Moses, Mother Teresa, and Bono. We are vastly interconnected. Our fates are inseparable. We are here because the dream of every cell is to become two cells. And dreams come true. In each of you are one quadrillion cells, 90 percent of which are not human cells. Your body is a community, and without those other microorganisms you would perish in hours. Each human cell has 400 billion molecules conducting millions of processes between trillions of atoms. The total cellular activity in one human body is staggering: one septillion actions at any one moment, a one with twenty-four zeros after it. In a millisecond, our body has undergone ten times more processes than there are stars in the universe, which is exactly what Charles Darwin foretold when he said science would discover that each living creature was a "little universe, formed of a host of self-propagating organisms, inconceivably minute and as numerous as the stars of heaven."

So I have two questions for you all: First, can you feel your body? Stop for a moment. Feel your body. One septillion activities going on simultaneously, and your body does this so well you are free to ignore it, and wonder instead when this speech will end. You can feel it. It is called life. This is who you are. Second question: who is in charge of your body? Who is managing those molecules? Hopefully not a political party. Life is creating the conditions that are conducive to life inside you, just as in all of nature. Our innate nature is to create the conditions that are conducive to life. What I want you to imagine is that collectively humanity is evincing a deep innate wisdom in coming together to heal the wounds and insults of the past.

Ralph Waldo Emerson once asked what we would do if the stars only came out once every thousand years. No one would sleep that night, of course. The world would create new religions overnight. We would be ecstatic, delirious, made rapturous by the glory of God. Instead, the stars come out every night and we watch television.

This extraordinary time when we are globally aware of each other and the multiple dangers that threaten civilization has never happened, not in a thousand years, not in ten thousand years. Each of us is as complex and beautiful as all the stars in the universe. We have done great things and we have gone way off course in terms of honoring creation. You are graduating to the most amazing, stupefying challenge ever bequested to any generation. The generations before you failed. They didn't stay up all night. They got distracted and lost sight of the fact that life is a miracle every moment of your existence. Nature beckons you to be on her side. You couldn't ask for a better boss.

The most unrealistic person in the world is the cynic, not the dreamer. Hope only makes sense when it doesn't make sense to be hopeful. This is your century. Take it and run as if your life depends on it.

Paul Hawken is an environmentalist, entrepreneur, journalist, and author. His books include Blessed Unrest.

Lutheran Web Radio

Try Christ Our Savior's Lutheran Web Radio at the following link or at the COSLC Web Radio link to the left. http://216.67.60.176:8000/listen.pls

6/8/09

Assembly

I have a wedding tomorrow. Is anyone going to be at the assembly meeting to counter the hate speech of Prevo with some good Lutheran Grace?

inclusive or exclusive?

Preaching Sunday on John 14: 6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7 If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him."

Is it an inclusive or an exclusive text? Does the Church sometimes push the cult of Jesus and view this as an exclusive text with the focus on “No one” rather than the inclusive ministry of Jesus where “through me” is a description of Grace?

6/2/09

Greetings from the Lower 48

Greetings from south central Utah, from the thriving metropolis of Price, population about the same as Sitka. Pastor Dan invited me to join the blog here and post something. I promised I would so here it is.

Linda and I are thoroughly enjoying our new life here. Last week we spent some time in Fairbanks/North Pole with the kids and had a blast. There are moments when we do miss Alaska, but it is the people we shared so much joy, grief, and love we miss more than the landscape.

From the temperate rain forest to the medium high desert, we find ourselves in another incredible landscape. The congregation is a blast. I did not think I would have this much fun at this end of my career as a pastor. But I am, we are, and thank God for all those blessings.

We were gratified to see that the boat is being refloated and the gospel will again ride the high seas. Pastor John Stevens is about 6 hours away from us up in Idaho and we are planning a couple of fund-raisers for the boat's ministry and for camping here in Utah and Idaho. An evening of Music and Magic. End of September and first part of October. First show here in Price, travel day, then the show at John's congregation(s) in Idaho. Come on down if you are int he area.

The WELCOME mat is always out so if you are traveling this way, let us know. We'd love to show you the new world out here.

Peace and Blessings.

6/1/09

Cheney offers support for gay marriage

If Dick Cheney can take this stand, surely the ELCA can stand up in favor of basic human rights.

Dick Cheney rarely takes a position that places him at a more progressive tilt than President Obama. But on Monday, the former vice president did just that, saying that he supports gay marriage as long as it is deemed legal by state and not federal government.

Speaking at the National Press Club for the Gerald R. Ford Foundation journalism awards, Cheney was asked about recent rulings and legislative action in Iowa and elsewhere that allowed for gay couples to legally wed.

"I think that freedom means freedom for everyone," replied the former V.P. "As many of you know, one of my daughters is gay and it is something we have lived with for a long time in our family. I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish. Any kind of arrangement they wish. The question of whether or not there ought to be a federal statute to protect this, I don't support. I do believe that the historically the way marriage has been regulated is at the state level. It has always been a state issue and I think that is the way it ought to be handled, on a state-by-state basis. ... But I don't have any problem with that. People ought to get a shot at that."

full article and video at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/01/cheney-offers-his-support_n_209869.html

5/29/09

Web radio

I think I have our web radio working again. Try the link on the left, coslc web radio and let me know if it opens for you

Dan

5/28/09

Made One

My wife, Carol, and I are back from a lovely trip outside to Billings, MT and Yellowstone. We had a great time with our three children and one soon-to-be daughter-in-law. We worshipped at our daugther's home church, Bethlehem Lutheran in Billings, pastored by Eric Thorson. It's a small church that was nearly dead. It's now being raised from death, by welcoming the stranger, the odd and different, the children who make a bit of noise, the gay and lesbian, etc. Our daughter made this her church home largely because the people are so welcoming. Some young families are starting to come and join. It's interesting to me that the full liturgy is sung ("Now the Feast" when we were there), with the feeble help of a weak electronic keyboard, and that the people sing the hymns of the faith from ELW and yet it is so welcoming and "family friendly." People manage a worship book, a liturgy booklet, and a bulletin. Imagine that!

What do you think brings us to church, gathers us in and empowers us to participate? Is it that we expect a good show, that we look forward to seeing our church friends, that we hold in common certain opinions, political views, work habits, social and economic status, ethnic heritage, family roots? What unites us? What makes us one? Are we one because we think or feel or do something. No. Not if we are the church of Christ. God makes us one in Christ. God does this in and through Holy Baptism and then continues doing it, re - membering us as one in Christ, in and through Holy Communion.

Our unity is given, by God. It is not our doing, not our achievement. We sisters and brothers in Christ, members of the body of Christ, baptized believers in and followers of Jesus are MADE ONE in Christ Jesus. We are MADE ONE, not by virtue of ourselves, our efforts or any of our supposed virtues. We are MADE ONE by Christ, in Christ, through Christ, for Christ's sake. All the rest, what seems to separate us or distinguish us from one another, is overcome in and through our belonging to Christ.

The faith is not about us. The church is not about us. Our worship is not about us. It's all about God, God in Christ. The Spirit of God, through the gospel, calls, gathers, enlightens and sanctifies us in the true faith, making us one in Christ Jesus. God's work in, among and through us is what matters. If we put something else ahead of God's Spirit, then our faith is false, our worship empty and our church dead. If we do not together focus on Jesus, journey together with Jesus, faithfully follow in the Way of Jesus, then we deceive ourselves and others, for then we are not church, not Christian, but just a religious club, a society of spiritual sentiment. We are not the church of Christ when we focus on ourselves. It is not worship when we come primarily to receive and get instead of to offer ourselves to God and give God thanks and glory. It is not faith if we are in it just to save our own skin.

Related story: A woman in one car and a man in another have a fairly serious automobile accident. Both cars are "totaled," unable to be driven. Although both the man and woman are "shaken up," neither is physically hurt. They carefully crawl out of their cars and the woman says, "Wow, look at our cars! There's nothing left; but praise God we're alive! This must be a sign from God that we should meet, become friends, and live together in peace." The man agrees. "And look here," the woman says, taking a full bottle of wine from her demolished car. "It's a miracle. This unbroken bottle of wine must mean that God wants us to celebrate our good fortune and drink to one another's health and happiness!" The man agrees. The woman opens the bottle and hands it to the man. She tells him to drink first and to drink as much as he likes. He begins sipping the wine from the bottle. He offers it back to the woman, but she says, "No you enjoy yourself. I'll wait my turn." Finally, when the man had drunk about half of the bottle, he says to the woman, "Aren't you having any?" She replies, "No. I think I'll just wait for the police."

Hmm? I think I'll trust the God who makes us one.

Not a matter of if, only when

Russell Simmons frames it well,(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/russell-simmons/it-is-not-a-matter-of-if_b_208351.html) it is not a matter of if, only a matter of when. When will the Lutheran Church enter on the side of love and inclusion and pick up the banner in support of gay marriage? Or will we do as we have done on many important national ethical issues before and come marching up the rear with a sign saying "we were with you all along." Yes, we would lose members in making the ethical decision to stand up for love and inclusion, but would we not also open the door to growth by finally taking a stand?

It is remarkable that it took only one day for our beautiful country to show its greatest potential and its greatest challenge. And that day was Tuesday. In the morning, I was inspired by the President's nomination of Justice Sonia Sotomayor for a seat on the Supreme Court. Yet, in the afternoon I was deeply saddened by the decision made by the California Supreme Court upholding Proposition 8.

It pains me that we have come to a point in this country where we use the ballot box to address the civil rights of our people. If President Johnson had to take a vote, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 would not have passed. If Congress took a vote in 1920, women may still not have the right to vote today. And if President Lincoln went to the polls, blacks would definitely have endured many more years of slavery. We trusted our government to make the right decision and protect the minority, and yesterday we, as a nation, failed.

Unfortunately, most of the arguments against these monumental advancements of our country's history have been deeply rooted in religion; and in my opinion the misuse of religion. Let's remove religion from this discussion, and focus on the greatest gift religion has given all of us, the ability to love. And as an African-American, I urge my own people to take a deep look at our own struggles and not wish them upon anyone else. Simply, civil rights for all is about being connected as humans, united, tolerant, loving and brave.

We have come such a long way in this country. Let's us not stop now. Vermont and Maine have done the right thing by legalizing same sex marriage, and I am extremely supportive of my own Governor, David Paterson, to follow suit in New York.

In my heart, I know that marriage equality for every human being isn't a question of if, but only a matter of when. I ask those who feel that giving freedom to others somehow binds you, to please take a good look at what you are standing behind. It is only through opening your hearts will you be able to see that by promoting freedom for all, you are unchaining yourself. I guess I'm an optimist. I have faith in people and our government ultimately to do the right thing. And to my brothers and sisters in California, I'm there with you every step of the way until that day comes...

5/21/09

Enjoy the show

Glenn, I thought you might enjoy this one from Nakedpastor.com

5/14/09

Not bad for a dime

Dad: I am never going back to that church, it was hot, the seats were uncomfortable, the sermon was boring and the singing was off key.

Son: Gee Dad; I didn’t think it was bad for a dime!

How do we walk that fine line between entertainment and being contextually relevant? I hear the term “worship war” used which often means bringing music into the service that is a bit more contemporary than what is in the current hymnal promoted by Augsburg Fortress. Keeping in mind the track record (Jimi Hendrix died in September of 1970 and the “Green Book” LBW came out in September of 1978) I am not impressed with what Augsburg Fortress deems as contextual. Liturgy is the work of the people, but it is also the voice of the people and all too often it is the voice of the classically trained church musicians foisted upon them.

I remember going to a conference on Worship and music at St. Olaf where the opening speaker was the head of the music department (can’t remember his name). He stated very emphatically that the only proper form of music for worship is Classical and once in a rare, rare while, folk, as long as the music people could have it for at least six months ahead of time to work it into a proper musical style. During a later comment period I suggested the best thing they could do for the church, in light of the numbers of young people who were leaving in droves, was to throw the damn pipe organ out the window and hire a rock band. The suggestion did not fly well with the presenters but did gain resonance with those attending.

On the other hand, I have found it very difficult to come up with good contemporary worship hymnody. I believe it was Lisa that referred to a lot of the contemporary stuff (which comes from non-Lutheran traditions) as “Jesus is my boyfriend” songs, and I would agree.

How can Lutheran worship remain true to its contemporary and contextual musical roots? I believe AF did a great disservice in the publishing of yet another closed source book, known as the cranberry hymnal. It does have some nice stuff, but compared to the musical language spoken by those attending, and the musical voice of those we are trying to reach (as exemplified by what is on their ipod playlist) we are no closer the mark than we were with the Green Book/Hendirix divide.

How can the church create, and encourage the growth of, an open source of Church hymnody? One that speaks to the musical language of the Seward Peninsula as well as the growing Hispanic and other ethnic voices in addition to contemporary and traditional traditions? Any published hymnal is, but the time it is sold, out of date. And the budgetary restraint of ownership perpetuates the church’s continued lack of contextual voice.

Liturgy is the work of the people, but it is a work that need not be difficult and foreign to our traditions.

In college a friend and I had a laugh over recalled conversations in his home church some years before. The church was considering adding an English service to the regular Norwegian language worship. The main argument against such was that God did not understand English. We laughed at the time, but is it humorous or tragic, that in the language of music, we perpetuate a similar argument today?

I wish I had a solution, I do not. All I have is frustration as I see the eyes glaze over at yet another hymn from the 1800’s, the boom, boom, boom on the car sound system as they drive out of the church parking lot, and the conversations with those who are leaving the church for the one down the street where worship is more “fun,” and the lack of the ability to offer both “fun” and “meaning” in the work of the people as they experience a message of Grace. How long do we continue to shoot ourselves in our evangelical foot for the sake of traditional musical purity?

5/13/09

Worship as Offering

How might we help our people worship, not only enter into worship, but bring their worship? Yes, we live in a time when people expect to be entertained and amused, whether by a sermon that knocks their socks off, by singing their one or two favorite hymns, by a rousing choir anthem, or some other form of worship show. Folks come to church, get their program at the door, find their seat, and expect to be amused and entertained, well, maybe occasionally comforted or challenged, but that's probably the need of someone else.
How might we help our people prepare to offer their worship?
Before the service of worship ever begins, we begin our preparations to worship. Not only do we prepare our bodies (shower, shave, comb hair, dress), but we also prepare our minds and hearts. We prepare to enter into corporate worship with our sisters and brothers even as we bring our own worship of heart, mind and body. As we gather, we invoke God's presence. We gather in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. This invocation reminds us that as followers of Jesus we live in vocation in this world. As Christians, we have a common calling and we have our own unique personal callings--in the realms of worship and Christian fellowship, work and study, state and nation, earth and environment, home and family, and in our calling to our own bodies, minds and spirits.
Worship doesn't happen to us as passive spectators, but worship is something we do, our work, our liturgy. It is our offering. I think of Cain and his problem with Abel (and God). Cain expected God to make a fuss over his offering, imagining that his worship offering was all about God doing something for him. Cain was depressed, his face fallen. Yahweh God came to Cain, "What's the matter? Why are you upset? Why are you depressed and your face so sad? If you do well, is there not already an uplifting?" In other words, if your worship offering comes from a heart filled with praise and thanksgiving, then already your joy is complete.
Cain did not hear and heed God. He killed his brother. Do our so-called "worship wars," at least in part, begin even before people show up at church? Do they derive from misdirected expectations? Do we come expecting to have our faces lifted up or do we bring our uplifted faces in worship of God?

5/11/09

Mother's Day Proclamation - 1870

One of the great statements of history that should not go unheard.

by Julia Ward Howe

Arise then...women of this day!
Arise, all women who have hearts!
Whether your baptism be of water or of tears!
Say firmly:"We will not have questions answered by irrelevant agencies,
Our husbands will not come to us, reeking with carnage,
For caresses and applause.
Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn
All that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy and patience.
We, the women of one country,
Will be too tender of those of another country
To allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs.
"From the voice of a devastated Earth a voice goes up with Our own.
It says: "Disarm! Disarm!
The sword of murder is not the balance of justice.
"Blood does not wipe our dishonor,
Nor violence indicate possession.
As men have often forsaken the plough and the anvil
At the summons of war,
Let women now leave all that may be left of home
For a great and earnest day of counsel.
Let them meet first, as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead.
Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means
Whereby the great human family can live in peace...
Each bearing after his own time the sacred impress, not of Caesar,
But of God -
In the name of womanhood and humanity, I earnestly ask
That a general congress of women without limit of nationality,
May be appointed and held at someplace deemed most convenient
And the earliest period consistent with its objects,
To promote the alliance of the different nationalities,
The amicable settlement of international questions,
The great and general interests of peace.

5/10/09

First time

This is my first blog. Still trying to figure it all out.

5/9/09

smile!

Note: if you click on a picture it will enlarge in a new screen


boundaries

The spirit leads Philip beyond the “acceptable” boundaries of the early church, from baptizing the Ethiopian eunuch in the Philistine area of Gaza in the south to pagan area of the Galilee in the north. What boundaries is the spirit trying to push us beyond that our “civilized” church finds unacceptable?

5/8/09

Synod Gathering
















Welcome

Welcome to Table Talk of the Alaska Synod of the ELCA. I pray you will find this blog interesting and informative and that we may be able to have some helpful conversations.